Immigration detention in the UK – 7 things everyone should know
I OPPOSE INHUMANE MIGRANT DETENTION
Urgent This is the public record of opposition to inhumane migrant detention in the UK.
Let’s call indefinite migrant detention what it is – an extreme human rights abuse. Make sure your voice is heard and join the public record of opposition today.
The government’s highly controversial policy of indefinite immigration detention has been widely criticised, and has become one of the most important human rights issues facing the country today. But the scale of this problem, and the reality of what’s going on inside the UK’s detention centres, is still not widely known.
If we were to remember just one thing about the current situation, it’s hard to do better than the words of the Home Affairs Select Committee this year:
“We have found serious problems with almost every element of the immigration detention system. People are being wrongfully detained, held in immigration detention when they are vulnerable and detained for too long.”
Here are the facts:
1. The scale of immigration detention is huge
Immigration detention in the UK is run on an enormous scale. There are seven detention centres around the country and approximately 25,000 people are held every year.
The biggest detention centres are next to Heathrow Airport – Harmondsworth and Colnbrook together make up the biggest detention centre in Europe. Yarl’s Wood, the centre where women are held, is perhaps the most well known. Possibly the most infamous centre is Brook House near Gatwick Airport. In 2017 a BBC Panorama expose showed undercover footage of vicious abuse and neglect of those held there.
2. Detention is indefinite
Possibly the most controversial aspect of detention in the UK is that there is no limit on how long people can be held. We see clients who are detained for days, months or even many years – and see the devastating toll this takes on both mental and physical health.
There is now an emerging consensus among MPs and experts that 28 days is a reasonable time limit for immigration detention. This year the 28-day time limit was recommended by the Home Affairs Select Committee and the Joint Committee on Human Rights – which the government has now rejected.
3. The reality of who is held in immigration detention is complex
The reality of who is held in immigration detention is not as simple as ‘people who should not be in the UK’.
As well as seeing so many incredibly vulnerable people, one of the most striking things about working in the centres is how many people with thick British accents you hear. These are people who most likely came to the UK as children, but are now being labelled as ‘foreign’ and face deportation to countries they do not know.
We also see people who have been trafficked – those who have been forced across borders in order to be exploited in brothels, nail bars and building sites. We see people who have survived torture in their countries of origin and fled to the UK for safety. We see LGBTQI+ people who have fled persecution in countries where they are criminalised for who they are.
We also see people who have served time in prison, but, as Michael’s story in this video shows, this is also not straightforward.
4. This is detention without judges or courts
Decisions to detain indefinitely are made by the Home Office. No courts or judges are involved.
The problem is that the government doesn’t have legal criteria for who gets put in immigration detention and all the decisions are made by the Home Office – which has led to thousands being detained for no reason. The Home Office so frequently gets it wrong that the majority of people it detains are released and it has paid out millions for unlawfully detaining people.
… a serious lack of judicial oversight of the decision to detain. Decisions to hold an individual in immigration detention are taken by Home Office officials and not by a Judge or court.
5. Indefinite detention is not an issue of the left or right
Fixing our broken immigration detention system is not an issue of any particular political party. It’s about human beings and human rights, due process and justice. MPs from across Parliament have joined forces in condemning indefinite detention, and calling for a time limit of 28 days.
Here’s how MPs have described indefinite detention in Parliament recently.
“The national shame of indefinite detention” – David Davis MP (Conservative)
“Deep concern on all sides about detention in excess of 28 days” – Andrew Mitchell MP (Conservative)
“Lack of due process… A monstrous system” – Diane Abbott MP (Labour)
“Unaccountable, arbitrary, indefinite detention is a human rights abuse” – Harriet Harman MP (Labour)
6. There is a crisis of harm in UK detention centres
A recent independent report revealed a surge in self-harm in Morton Hall immigration detention centre. Inspectors found a 20% increase in self-harm incidents, despite a drop in the number of people held there.
A crisis of harm is unfolding in UK detention centres. This includes serious physical and mental health problems, suicide, and an epidemic of self-harm, which has become a daily occurrence. This is unacceptable, but an inevitable consequence of detaining vulnerable people indefinitely.
7. A huge waste of money
The total cost of this UK’s system of indefinite immigration detention is currently £108 million per year. In addition, it was revealed last year that the Home Office paid out £21m in just five years for wrongfully detaining 850 people.
Recent analysis by Liberty and Cambridge Econometrics revealed that a 28-day time limit for immigration detention could save the taxpayer up to £35million per year.